Periodontal infections and therapeutic implications - JPIO n° 2 du 01/05/2000
 

Journal de Parodontologie & d'Implantologie Orale n° 2 du 01/05/2000

 

Articles

Arie J. VAN WINKELHOFF *   Willy A. VAN DER REIJDEN **  


*Department of Oral Biology
Section Clinical Oral Microbiology
Academic Centre for Dentistry
Amsterdam
The Netherlands

Introduction

Periodontal infections are the result of an imbalance between the host's defence system and the oral microflora. Periodontitis occurs in individuals that have the inability to control the subgingival microflora. Bacteria are essential for the disease to develop, they need however a susceptible host to initiate the disease. In gingivitis the inflammation is restricted to the gingiva whereas in periodontitis destruction of connective tissue attachment and alveolar bone...


Summary

Periodontitis is a multifactorial infection of the tooth-supporting tissuses. Subgingival bacteria play an essential role in the onset and progression of the disease. Other factors such as smoking, stress, systemic disease, impairment of the host immune system and possibly genetic factors may be important modifying factors. The microbial composition of the subgingival plaque in periodontitis can differ significantly between indifiduals and pathogens usually occur in certain clusters. Strict anaerobic Gram negative rods as well as the Gram negative capnophylic Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans are believed to be major pathogens in the progression of periodontitis. Mechanical debridement and periodontal surgery may not be effective in controlling the periodontal infection in all patients. In those individuals, systemic periodontal antimicrobial therapy can be a powerful additional tool to arrest active periodontal breakdown. The rationale for the use of clinical periodontal microbiology as a mean to select patients that may benefit from antibiotic therapy is discussed.

Key words

Periodontitis, microbiology, risk factors, antibiotics

Introduction

Periodontal infections are the result of an imbalance between the host's defence system and the oral microflora. Periodontitis occurs in individuals that have the inability to control the subgingival microflora. Bacteria are essential for the disease to develop, they need however a susceptible host to initiate the disease. In gingivitis the inflammation is restricted to the gingiva whereas in periodontitis destruction of connective tissue attachment and alveolar bone is involved.

Gingivitis occurs in virtually all humans and it is a reversible condition, i.e. dental plaque removal results in resolution of the inflammation. In contrast, periodontitis occurs in only a proportion of the population with a prevalence of 30-35 % in most parts of the world. Periodontal infections are mostly chronic but acute infections can occur, especially in individuals with an impaired host resistance.

Mechanisms that convert gingivitis into periodontitis are largely unknown but it has been speculated that the absence of antagonists of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor alpha may be critical (Assuma et al., 1998 ; Graves et al., 1998). Periodontitis has gained special interest from the medical field since this disease has been linked to pre-term delivery and low birth weight infants (Offenbacher et al., 1996) and coronary heart diseases (Beck et al., 1996). These observations may stimulate the periodontal community to put even more emphasis on the research on the pathogenesis and treatment of periodontitis. It may also have a great impact for researchers that are involved in improvement of clinical treatment protocols and on dental professionals who are daily occupied with the treatment of periodontal infections.

Risk factors

Not all individuals are equally susceptible to develop destructive periodontal disease. Several risk factors for the disease to develop have been proposed. These risk factors may not be identical in different clinical forms of periodontitis. Tableau I summarizes some risk factors that have been documented in the scientific literature. Some of these factors, especially those associated with prepubertal and early onset periodontitis, are directly related to the host immune system and may explain the inability to sufficiently control the subgingival microbial challenge. Other risk factors are involved in a hampered defence against microbial overgrowth of the commensal microbiota, which is observed frequently in chronic adult periodontitis.

Identification of putative risk factors may be essential for a proper diagnosis of the disease and they can identify susceptible individuals. They may also become part of treatment strategies in different patient categories. However, most of these factors cannot be manipulated which implies that the essential part of periodontal treatment remains control of the periodontal microflora. Knowledge of the bacterial component in periodontitis is therefore of importance for effective and predictable treatment outcome. Also, it is worthwhile to make the patient aware of its risk factors to enforce motivation for compliance of the treatment. Smoking and chronic stress are examples of so called co-factors that may be changed by the patient's behaviour.

Microbiology of periodontitis

An impressive and significant increase of our knowledge and understanding of the bacterial component of periodontal infections has been achieved in the past decade. New species have been discovered and described, clinical studies have clearly identified key pathogens that seem responsible for progression of periodontitis and improved treatment protocols, based on microbiological information, have become available (Haffajee and Socransky, 1994). Important findings include the following :

- the subgingival plaque in periodontal lesions can differ significantly between lesions in one individual as well as between subjects ;

- pathogens which have been linked with progressive periodontitis have been identified (Haffajee and Socransky, 1994) (table II) ;

- periodontal pathogens occur in certain clusters (Socransky et al., 1988a ; Socransky et al., 1988b) ;

- certain clusters of periodontal bacterial species are associated with active periodontitis breakdown whereas other clusters are more frequently found in individuals with stable periodontal sites (Socransky et al., 1988a) ;

- clusters are composed of Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria which are predominantly strict anaerobics ;

- Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans can occur in all clinical forms of periodontitis but it is found more frequently in young patients with periodontitis (Rodenburg et al., 1990) ;

- the frequency of detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis increases with age and is rarely isolated in patients under the age of 25 (Rodenburg et al., 1990) ;

- the distribution of A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis in healthy persons is very low, whereas the presence of these species is highly associated with periodontal disease, suggesting that these bacterial species are primary pathogens (Van Winkelhoff et al., 1994 ; Griffen et al., 1998) ;

- smoking affects the composition of the subgingival plaque in periodontitis patients (Kamma et al., 1999).

Microbial risk factors

Researchers at the Forsyth Dental Center have conducted a number of studies in which they have investigated the microbial component as a risk factor for future periodontal attachment loss (for review, see Haffajee and Socransky, 1994). Subjects were monitored at baseline for probing pocket depth and attachment level at 6 sites per tooth for all teeth, excluding third molars. These clinical data were taken at baseline and 2 months later without any periodontal treatment in between visits,≥ 2 mm of attachment loss was considered as active disease in this study. With this protocol they were able to link the presence and proportions of microbial species with future attachment loss. Table III shows the relationship between active and inactive periodontal sites and the presence of 3 periodontal bacterial species. Active sites were found more often positive for A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis and Streptococcus intermedius than inactive sites. Table IV summarizes the relative risks for further attachment loss of 3 periodontal bacterial species. The data show that the odds ratios for further attachment loss are related not only to the presence but also to the total mean counts of the pathogens. The calculated relative risks were highest for A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis when they exceeded 106 cells.

Although infections with A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis are regarded now as true infections, the commensal subgingival microbiota is of significant importance in the interpretation of the disease and the chosen therapy. As mentioned before, there are several risk factors that may influence the composition of the subgingival microflora. However, it is not well understood which host and environmental factors determine the composition of the subgingival microflora and how they are interrelated. Pocket depth, natural acquisition, supragingival plaque level, hormone levels, transmission at adult age are probably some of the factors that are important. For example, it has been found that presence and proportions of periodontal bacteria are different in periodontitis patients that smoke in comparison to non-smoking patients (Kamma et al., 1999).

Effects of treatment on the subgingival microflora

One aim of periodontal therapy is to arrest further loss of periodontal attachment and to ensure an aesthetic outcome. Treatment procedures include removal of tooth-borne bacterial plaques and calculus, often in conjunction with periodontal surgery, instruction in oral hygiene procedures and elimination of plaque retention factors. A microbiological approach to periodontal therapy aims primarily at reducing the total bacterial load and at suppressing specific pathogenic bacteria and permitting a subsequent recolonization of a microflora compatible with health. Supragingival plaque control in the supportive periodontal therapy phase helps to prevent recolonization by periodontal pathogens.

Selective elimination

Treatment studies on the effects of mechanical periodontal treatment have revealed that not all bacteria in deepened periodontal pockets are equally susceptible to scaling and root planing. Christersson showed, in patients with localized juvenile periodontitis, that scaling alone has very little effect on presence and levels of subgingival A. actinomycetemcomitans. Also, soft tissue curettage and periodontal surgery resulted in high post-treatment detection of this species. They were able to correlate post-treatment detection of A. actinomycetemcomitans with treatment outcome with clinical attachment gain as a variable. Soft tissue invasion of A. actinomycetemcomitans was suggested to be one major factor for the inability to suppress this pathogen in juvenile periodontitis (Christersson et al., 1985). Renvert studied the clinical and microbiological effects of initial periodontal treatment in adult periodontitis and focused on A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis. They found that post-treatment detection of one of these pathogens was related to minimal pocket depth reduction and reduced clinical attachment gain (fig. 1). They also showed that scaling and root planing had very little effect on the subgingival presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans and that the mean proportion of this species increased after treatment, which was in contrast to all other bacteria monitored. They concluded that A. actinomycetemcomitans is much more difficult to eliminate from periodontal pockets than P. gingivalis, showing the phenomenon of selective elimination of bacteria in the subgingival plaque of periodontitis lesions in adult patients.

There is little information in literature on residual periodontal pathogens and the likelihood for recurrent periodontal attachment loss. Wennström investigated 44 pocket in 30 refractory cases of adult periodontitis patients on the presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas intermedia and P. gingivalis and monitored these sites for 12 months for clinical attachment loss of ≥ 2 mm. They found that in 5 of 25 pockets, harboring 1 or more of the 3 pathogens, a significant loss of clinical attachment had occurred. In contrast, none of the 19 pockets without detectable pathogens showed periodontal attachment loss, showing that suppression of these periodontal bacteria is a rational treatment goal. In a five-year follow up study, Dahlén observed recurrence of A. actinomycetemcomitans or P. gingivalis in 9 out of 13 patients and this event was associated with further periodontal attachment loss in 6 of these 9 (67 %) patients. Interestingly, 4 patients without subgingival recurrence of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. intermedia or P. gingivalis did not show detectable loss of attachment during the 5 years of clinical monitoring. From these studies one can conclude that suppression of certain periodontal bacteria below detection level contributes to the predictability of periodontal treatment outcome and that microbiological monitoring can be one useful end-point of active periodontal treatment.

Adjunctive therapy with local delivered disinfectants to reduce the bacterial plaque mass has been investigated in numerous studies, both in vitro and in clinical studies. Rams and Slots (1996) have reviewed this topic extensively. Their conclusions are however reserved. The results of most clinical studies dealing with adjunctive local antimicrobial or disinfectant therapy are as effective as conventional mechanical cleansing. There are however very few reports discussing a rationale for using adjunctive local antimicrobial therapy in relation to the patient's subgingival microbiota. Nevertheless, the use of chlorhexidine as an adjunctive to conventional periodontal therapy may be considered (Addy et al., 1994 ; Addy and Moran, 1997). But, as concluded by Rams and Slots (1996), controlled clinical studies are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of such adjunctive therapy in periodontal disease. The role of uncontrolled shifts in the subgingival microbiota should, however, not be underestimated.

Systemic antimicrobial therapy in periodontics

Adult periodontitis patients with ongoing disease activity despite thorough supra- and subgingival debridement may be prime candidates for adjunctive antimicrobial therapy. These patients are often referred to as refractory periodontitis subjects. Also, patients with some form of early onset periodontitis may need additional antimicrobial therapy for a predictable and long-term stable treatment outcome. One prerequisite for an effective periodontal antimicrobial therapy is a thorough knowledge of the periodontal microflora. Periodontal pathogens predominantly belong to the group of Gram negative anaerobic rods, but also Gram positive anaerobic rods and cocci have been implicated. Some Gram negative facultative anaerobic rods are considered pathogens as well (table II).

The concept of antibiotic periodontal therapy revolves around the drug, the pathogenic microorganisms, and the host. Systemic periodontal antimicrobial therapy is based on the premise that specific microorganisms cause destructive periodontal disease (Van Winkelhoff et al., 1994) and that the antimicrobial agent in the periodontal pocket can exceed concentrations necessary to kill the pathogen(s). Compared to mechanical debridement and topical application of antiseptics, systemic antibiotic therapy has certain advantages. Via serum, systemic antibiotics can reach microorganisms at the base of deep periodontal pockets and furcation areas, and also may affect organisms residing within gingival epithelial and connective tissues. Systemic antibiotics may be capable of eradicating periodontal pathogens colonizing oral mucosa and other extra-dental sites. The possibility of eradicating periodontal pathogens from the entire mouth may reduce the risk for subgingival recolonization of pathogens and for future disease activity. It may also prevent transmission of periodontal pathogens to other humans.

Disadvantages of systemic antibiotic therapy over locally applied antibiotics include adverse drug reactions (Winkel et al., 1998), interactions with other drugs and uncertain patient compliance (Van Winkelhoff et al., 1996).

Clinical studies using single antibiotic regimes

The number of antibiotics tested for clinical efficacy in periodontics is still rather limited. The most frequently examined drugs involve tetracyclines, metronidazole, amoxicillin, amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid, clindamycin and, later discussed, combinations of antibiotics notably metronidazole and amoxicillin and metronidazole and spiramycin. For a comprehensive review on the clinical and microbiological effects of these drugs, see Van Winkelhoff . Some recently published studies on the efficacy of systemic antibiotic therapy will be discussed.

Metronidazole

Systemic metronidazole therapy can augment the clinical effect of mechanical periodontal treatment in some periodontitis patients. Metronidazole therapy without concomitant scaling and root planing provides very short-lived (up to 1 month) clinical and microbiological benefits (Walsh et al., 1986). In a placebo-controlled study, Lindhe observed that metronidazole (200 mg QID for 14 days, repeated 2 ¥ after 2 months intervals) in conjunction with scaling and root planing yielded a slight improvement in gingival status and clinical attachment compared to controls. Deep pockets (7 mm) responded equally well in the test and control group, whereas pockets of 5-6 mm depth responded better in the metronidazole group. Other researchers have demonstrated adjunctive metronidazole therapy to be more effective in adults with deep pockets than with less advanced periodontitis (Loesche et al., 1984 ; Söder et al., 1990). In conjunction with periodontal surgery, systemic metronidazole has not shown additional clinical effects (Sterry et al., 1985).

Loesche suggested that systemic metronidazole plus mechanical debridement may decrease the number of teeth in need of periodontal surgery or indicated for extraction due to periodontitis. The clinical effect paralleled a slight, but statistically significant decrease of subgingival spirochetes. Later Loesche and 1994) administered metronidazole or placebo after completion of the mechanical treatment and used 20 % subgingival spirochetes in at least 2 subgingival samples to trigger treatment. Again, at 4-6 weeks post-treatment, significant fewer teeth in the metronidazole group needed periodontal surgery.

Gusberti observed statistically significant improvement in mean pocket depth, attachment level and percentage of bleeding sites for up to 9 months after a combined therapy of mechanical debridement and systemic metronidazole (250 mg TID, 10 days). Using ornidazole, Mombelli observed essentially the same effects in patients with recurrent periodontal disease.

Recently, Winkel tested a regime of 500 mg metronidazole TID for 7 days in patients with refractory adult periodontitis. Patients were selected on the basis of subgingival presence of Bacteroides forsythus with or without P. gingivalis and P. intermedia, and absence of A. actinomycetemcomitans. They found that the reduction in probing pocket depth and the gain of clinical attachment after renewed debridement in conjunction with systemic metronidazole therapy was related to post-treatment detection of the target organisms, notably P. gingivalis and B. forsythus (fig. 2).

In conclusion, systemic metronidazole therapy may results in a marked reduction of anaerobics in the periodontal pocket. However, subgingival anaerobic bacteria tend to reappear after metronidazole therapy (Loesche et al., 1992 ; Loesche and Giordano, 1994). The reason may be an incomplete removal of pathogens at the treated sites or a rapid recolonization of treated sites from other oral sites. Successful metronidazole therapy is also related to proper supragingival plaque control (Winkel et al., 1997). One other determining factor for incomplete removal of periodontal pathogens may be tobacco use (Grossi et al., 1996).

Amoxicillin

The use of amoxicillin or amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid (to protect the drug from bacterial degradation) in the treatment of periodontitis has been described in several studies (Abu-Fanas et al., 1991 ; Magnusson et al., 1989 ; Magnusson et al., 1994). Although a large proportion of the subgingival microflora is susceptible to amoxicillin in vitro, the clinical effects of this antibiotic are limited and recurrence of disease activity has been reported. Winkel found that reduction of mean probing pocket depths and mean change in clinical attachment were similar in test and placebo groups 3 months after active periodontal treatment including systemic amoxicilline and clavulanic acid (500/125 mg TID, 7 days). Darkfield microscopy revealed no differences in the proportions of spirochetes and motile rods in test and placebo groups. Also, no significant differences were observed in the post-treatment detection of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, B. forsythus and other periodontal pathogens. The authors concluded that systemic amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid provided no additional clinical and microbiological effects in the treatment of adult periodontitis in patients with undetermined disease activity.

Combination antimicrobial therapy

Since the subgingival microbiota in destructive periodontal disease consists of various putative pathogens that may differ in antimicrobial susceptibility, the use of a combination of two or more antibiotics may represent a valuable approach in periodontal chemotherapy. Combination antibiotic therapy may help :

- to broaden the antimicrobial range of the therapeutic regimen beyond that attained by any single antibiotic ;

- to prevent the emergence of bacterial resistance by using agents with overlapping antimicrobial spectra ;

- to lower the dose of individual antibiotics by exploiting possible synergy between two drugs against targeted organisms.

Metronidazole plus amoxicillin or ciprofloxacin have been used successfully in the treatment of advanced A. actinomycetemcomitans-associated periodontitis (Van Winkelhoff et al., 1996). Metronidazole and amoxicillin in vitro exert synergistic activity against A. actinomycetemcomitans (Pavicic et al., 1991) and these antibiotics markedly suppress or eliminate A. actinomycetemcomitans and other subgingival organisms in periodontitis lesions.

Recently, Berglundh investigated the clinical and microbiological effects of metronidazole and amoxicillin in adult patients with periodontitis. They used a split-mouth design in a placebo-controlled study protocol with a follow-up period of 24 months. Clinical and microbiological features improved better at sites that were scaled and root planed in patients that had received systemic metronidazole and amoxicillin than sites that had received only mechanical treatment in the placebo group. Especially the proportion of sites gaining ≥ 2 mm of clinical attachment was significantly higher in the antibiotic patients. This was most obvious in sites with an initial probing pocket depth ≥ 6 mm (fig. 3). Only in the patients that had received metronidazole and amoxicillin A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis were under the level of detection after 12 months. These observations confirm and complete earlier observations (Van Winkelhoff et al., 1989 ; Van Winkelhoff et al., 1992 ; Goené et al., 1990 ; Pavicic et al., 1994 ; Winkel et al., 1998).

Metronidazole/ciprofloxacin can be useful with mixed periodontal infections involving anaerobic bacteria, A. actinomycetemcomitans, enteric rods and Pseudomonas (Slots and Van Winkelhoff, 1993). Since metronidazole/ciprofloxacin does not affect most Gram positive facultative bacteria, this combination of antimicrobials may facilitate recolonization of the pocket by health-associated facultative streptococci of low periodontopathic potential.

The combination of metronidazole plus spiramycin is frequently used in some European countries. The long-term clinical and microbiological effects of this therapy have not been documented satisfactory and this drug combination needs more investigation.

Treatment protocol

Antibiotics should be considered one of the possible tools available in periodontal therapy. Use of systemic antimicrobial agents in periodontics without proper diagnosis and mechanical debridement should be regarded as improper. Also, overuse of antibiotics leads to development of microbial resistance not only in the periodontal pockets and other body sites (Van Winkelhoff et al., 2000).

Many adult periodontitis lesions are associated with indigenous microorganisms. The general strategy for controlling this type of periodontal infection relies on reduction of the supra- and subgingival microbial load. Many adult periodontitis patients can be treated effectively by conventional non-surgical or surgical debridement and adequate oral hygiene measures in the maintenance phase. Patients with high levels of exogenous periodontal pathogens often are recalcitrant to conventional periodontal treatment and are candidates for adjunctive antibiotic therapy. For exogenous periodontal infections a realistic treatment goal is the complete removal of the pathogen(s) (Van Winkelhoff et al., 1996).

Microbiological testing is a useful tool to select patients that may benefit from an adjunctive antibiotic therapy. Administration of systemic antibiotics without microbiological diagnosis may provide a suboptimal therapy with a poor predictability. Subjects that are eligible for microbiological testing include :

- patient with a poor therapy response after conventional periodontal treatment despite good oral hygiene measure ;

- patients with recurrence of disease activity in the maintenance phase ;

- patients with an early onset form of periodontitis ;

- family members in families with early onset forms of periodontitis ;

- partially edentulous patients scheduled for dental implants.

A clinical healthy outcome is the ultimate goal of periodontal therapy. One end-point of active periodontal therapy is absence of certain putative exogenous bacteria, i.e. A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis, and levels of commensal periodontopathic bacteria should be under certain threshold values (Rams et al., 1996).

CONCLUDING REMARKS

This article discusses the current insights in the microbiological part of periodontal disease management and the impact of the subgingival microbiota in the individual patient. In summary, five concluding statements can be propound :

- periodontitis is an infection in which more than one bacterial species is involved ;

- host factors and/or environmental risk factors play a crucial role in the onset and development of periodontitis ;

- treatment of periodontitis is primarily based on reduction of the subgingival bacterial load. This should be combined with elimination or control of alterable riskfactors ;

- elimination of A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis often needs adjunctive antibiotic therapy. Appropriate antibiotic therapy is based on testing of the composition of the microbial flora and the differentiated counts of the microflora ;

- one end-point of active therapy is determined by the composition of the subgingival microbiota which should be dominated by facultative Gram positive cocci and rods. This will result in stabilization of the disease and a renewed balance between host and microflora (Rams et al., 1996).

Demande de tirés à part

A.J. VAN WINKELHOLF, Department of Oral Biology, Section Clinical Oral Microbilogy, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 B1 AMSTERDAM - THE NETHERLANDS.

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

  • ABU-FANAS SH, DRUCKER DB, HULL PS. Amoxicillin with clavulanic acid and tetracycline in periodontal therapy. J Dent Res 1991;19:97-99.
  • ADDY M, MORAN JM. Clinical indications for the use of chemical adjuncts to plaque control : chlorhexidine formulations. Periodontology 2000 1997;15:52-54.
  • ADDY M, MORAN J, WADE W. Chemical plaque control in the prevention of gingivitis and periodontitis. In : Lang NP, Karring T, eds. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. Londres : Quintessence, 1994:244-257.
  • ASSUMA R, OATES T, COCHRAN D, AMAR S, GRAVES DT. IL-1 and TNF antagonists inhibit the inflammatory response and bone loss in experimental periodontitis. J Immunol 1998;160:403-409.
  • BECK J, GARCIA R, HEISS G, VOKONAS PS, OFFENBACHER S. Periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease. J Periodontol 1996;67:1123-1137.
  • BERGLUNDH T, KROK L, LILJENBERG B, WESTFELT E, SERINO G, LINDHE J. The use of metronidazole and amoxicillin in the treatment of advanced periodontal disease. A prospective, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:354-362.
  • CHRISTERSSON LA, SLOTS J, ROSLING B, GENCO RJ. Microbiological and clinical effects of surgical treatment of localized juvenile periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1985;12:465-476.
  • DAHLÉN G, WIKSTRÖM M, RENVERT S. Treatment of periodontal disease based on microbiological diagnosis. A 5-year follow-up on individual patterns. J Periodontol 1996;67:879-887.
  • GOENÉ RJ, WINKEL EG, ABBAS F, RODENBURG JP, VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, DE GRAAFF J. Microbiology in diagnosis and treatment of severe periodontitis. A report of four cases. J Periodontol 1990;61:61-64.
  • GRAVES DT, DELINA AJ, ASSUMA R, AMAR S, OATES T, COCHRAN D. Interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor antagonists inhibit the progression of inflammatory cell infiltration towards alveolar bone in experimental periodontitis. J Periodontol 1998;69:1419-1425.
  • GRIFFEN AL, BECKER MR, LYONS SR, MOESCHBERGER ML, LEYS EJ. Prevalence of Porphyromonas gingivalis and periodontal health status. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:3239-3242.
  • GROSSI SG, SKREPCINSKI FB, DECARO T, ZAMBON JJ, CUMMINS D, GENCO RJ. Response to periodontal therapy in diabetics and smokers. J Periodontol 1996;67:1094-1102.
  • GUSBERTI FA, SYED SA, LANG NP. Combined antibiotic (metronidazole) and mechanical treatment effects on the subgingival bacterial flora of sites with recurrent periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15: 353-359.
  • HAFFAJEE AD, SOCRANSKY SS. Microbial etiological agents of destructive periodontal disease. Periodontology 2000 1994;5:78-111.
  • KAMMA JJ, NAKOU M, BAEHNI PC. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of smokers with early onset periodontitis. J Periodont Res 1999;34:25-33.
  • LINDHE J, LILJENBERG B, ADIELSON B, BORJESSON I. Use of metronidazole as a probe in the study of human periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10:100-112.
  • LOESCHE WJ, GIORDANO JR. Metronidazole in periodontitis. V. Debridement should precede medication. Compend Cont Educ Dent 1994;15:1198-1218.
  • LOESCHE WJ, GIORDANO JR, HUJOEL P, SCHWARCZ J, SMITH BA. Metronidazole in periodontitis : reduced need for surgery. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:103-112.
  • LOESCHE WJ, SCHMIDT E, SMITH BA, MORRISON EC, CAFFESSE R, HUJOEL P. Metronidazole in periodontitis. II. Effects upon treatment needs. J Periodontol 1991;62:247-257.
  • LOESCHE WJ, SYED SA, MORRISON EC, KERRY GA, HIGGINS T, STOLL J. Metronidazole in periodontitis. I. Clinical and bacteriological results after 15 to 30 weeks. J Periodontol 1984;55:325-335.
  • MAGNUSSON I, CLARK WB, LOW SB, MARUNAIK J, MARKS RG, WALKER CB. Effect of non-surgical periodontal therapy combined with adjunctive antibiotics in subjects with « refractory » periodontal disease. I. Clinical results. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:647-653.
  • MAGNUSSON I, LOW SB, McARTHUR WP, MARKS RG, WALKER CB, MARUNIAK J et al. Treatment of subjects with refractory periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:628-637.
  • MOMBELLI A, GUSBERTI FA, LANG NP. Treatment of recurrent periodontal disease by root planing and ornidazole (Tiberal®). Clinical and microbiological findings. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:38-45.
  • OFFENBACHER S, KATZ V, FGERTIK G, COLLINS J, BOYD D, MAYNOR G et al. Periodontal infection as a possible risk factor for preterm low birth weight. J Periodontol 1996;67:1103-1113.
  • PAVICIC MJAMP, VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, DE GRAAFF J. Synergistic effects between amoxicillin, metronidazole and the hydroxymetabolite of metronidazole against Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991;35:961-966.
  • PAVICIC MJAMP, VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, DOUQUÉ NH, STEURES RWR, DE GRAAFF J. Microbiological and clinical effects of metronidazole and amoxicillin in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans associated periodontitis : a 2-year evaluation. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:107-112.
  • RAMS TE, LISTGARTEN MA, SLOTS J. Utility of 5 major putative periodontal pathogens and selected clinical parameters to predict periodontal breakdown. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:346-354.
  • RAMS TE, SLOTS J. Local delivery of antimicrobial agents in the periodontal pocket. Periodontology 2000 1996;10:139-159.
  • RENVERT S, WIKSTRÖM M, DAHLÉN G, SLOTS J, EGELBERG J. Effect of root debridement on the elimination of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans from periodontal pockets. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:345-350.
  • RODENBURG JP, VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, WINKEL EG, GOENÉ RJ, ABBAS F, DE GRAAFF J. Occurrence of Bacteroides gingivalis, Bacteroides intermedius and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in progressive periodontal disease in relation to age and treatment history. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:392-399.
  • SLOTS J, VAN WINKELHOFF AJ. Antimicrobial therapy in periodontics. Cal Dent Assoc J 1993;21:51-56.
  • SOCRANSKY SS, HAFFAJEE AD, DZINK JL. Relationship of subgingival microbial complexes to clinical features at the sampled sites. J Clin Periodontol 1988a;15:440-444.
  • SOCRANSKY SS, HAFFAJEE AD, DZINK JL, HILLMAN JD. Associations between microbial species in subgingival plaque samples. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1988b;3:1-7.
  • SÖDER PO, FRITHIOF L, WIKNER S, WOUTERS FR, NEDLICH V, SÖDER B et al. The effect of systemic metronidazole after non-surgical treatment in moderate and advanced periodontitis in young adults. J Periodontol 1990;61:281-288.
  • STERRY KA, LANGEROUDI M, DOLBY AE. Metronidazole as an adjunct to periodontal therapy with subgingival curettage. Br Dent J 1985;158:176-178.
  • VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, RAMS TE, SLOTS J. Systemic antibiotic therapy in periodontics. Periodontology 2000 1996;10:45-78.
  • VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, RODENBURG JP, GOENÉ RJ, ABBAS F, WINKEL EG, DE GRAAFF J. Metronidazole plus amoxycillin in the treatment of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans associated periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:128-131.
  • VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, TIJHOF CJ, DE GRAAFF J. Microbiological and clinical results of metronidazole plus amoxicillin therapy in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans associated periodontitis. J Periodontol 1992;63:52-57.
  • VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, WINKEL EG, SLOTS J. Microbiology in diagnosis and treatment planning in periodontics. J Parodontol Implantol Orale 1994;13:439-450.
  • VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, GONZALES DH, WINKEL EG, DELLEMIJN-KIPPUW N, VANDENBROUCKE-GRAULS CMJE, SANZ M. Antimicrobial resistance in the subgingival microflora in patients with adult periodontitis. A comparison between The Netherlands and Spain. J Clin Periodontology 2000;27:79-86.
  • WALSH MM, BUCHANAN SA, HOOVER C, NEWBRUN E, TAGGERT EJ, ARMITAGE GC et al. Clinical and microbiological effects of single-dose metronidazole or scaling and root planing in the treatment of adult periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:151-157.
  • WENNSTRÖM J, DAHLÉN G, SVENSSON J, NYMAN S. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Bacteroides gingivalis and Bacteroides intermedius : predictors of attachment loss ? Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2: 158-163.
  • WINKEL EG, VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, BARENDREGT DS, VAN DER WEIJDEN GA, TIMMERMAN MF, VAN DER VELDEN U. Clinical and microbiological effects of initial periodontal therapy in conjunction with amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in patients with adult periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:461-468.
  • WINKEL EG, VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, TIMMERMAN MF, VANGSTED T, VAN DER VELDEN U. Effects of metronidazole in patients with « refractory » periodontitis associated with Bacteroides forsythus. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:573-579.
  • WINKEL EG, VAN WINKELHOFF AJ, VAN DER VELDEN U. Additional clinical and microbiological effects of amoxicillin and metronidazole after initial periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:857-864.

Articles de la même rubrique d'un même numéro